Dev Builds » 20260703-1827

You are viewing an old NCM Stockfish dev build test. You may find the most recent dev build tests using Stockfish 15 as the baseline here.

Use this dev build

NCM plays each Stockfish dev build 20,000 times against Stockfish 14. This yields an approximate Elo difference and establishes confidence in the strength of the dev builds.

Summary

Host Duration Avg Base NPS Games WLD Standard Elo Ptnml(0-2) Gamepair Elo

Test Detail

ID Host Base NPS Games WLD Standard Elo Ptnml(0-2) Gamepair Elo CLI PGN

Commit

Commit ID 99489f57dddb121e1db887d35561ea58abd4158a
Author anematode
Date 2026-07-03 18:27:33 UTC
Simplify out pext attacks Passed STC non-regression on avx512icl (https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6a421b46f97ff95f78795061) LLR: 2.96 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25> Total: 81632 W: 21240 L: 21075 D: 39317 Ptnml(0-2): 184, 8907, 22464, 9082, 179 Passed STC non-regression on bmi2 (https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/view/6a41f6f9f97ff95f7879503e) LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25> Total: 78112 W: 20411 L: 20245 D: 37456 Ptnml(0-2): 188, 8449, 21632, 8583, 204 After #6845 , pext attacks are slower or equal to parallel-hyperbola attacks which works on all architectures that pext supports. SVE2 supports pext/pdep in vector registers, but it's much slower than the `rbit`-based HQ that we have on ARM, so I don't foresee the code being useful there. Ofc I don't think we should remove the `bmi2` build or anything, because it's nice for people to be able to freely use pext when testing ideas, and I'm sure we'll some day find another use for it! closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/Stockfish/pull/6939 No functional change Co-authored-by: Dubslow <bunslow@gmail.com>
Copyright 2011–2026 Next Chess Move LLC